Dear Future-Lennard,
Please remember these following questions to yourself.
Today was the talk "Thesis?!", a conversation between Brett Steele and Hernan Diaz Alonso,
Architects make arguments, not projects. A welcome relief. And maybe, for lack of an argument, such an issue should be invented. "Build the world differently", said Brett. The limits of my experience is the limits of my world is the limits of my architecture. One has to exceed the other and all should surpass everything(one?) else. Build the world differently. Please remember this.
The construction of an idea, so make that idea provocative, compelling. Ultimately, the inhabitation of an idea. Remember the moment after you read Rand, Terazni, Calvino. The world changed even though nothing changed because you changed. Your world view changed and thats what you have to do en masse. "Enframing, reframing"
The 19th century was the institutionalization of architecture via the ecole de beaux arts et all. The 20th, the era of the singular project. Superstudio. Rem.
The 21st? "this is a hunch... but its about the network. its about information and communication. ether."
What happened to Negroponte and Mitchell. Was it a cynicism or tiredness with architecture that turned them away? Maybe the game we play as we know it is too small. "architecture isn't constructive", said rem. or something along those lines. Jettison the title or redefine it, but don't subscribe to it.
Remember this please future-lennard.
Lennard-Past.